Council tax will have to soar by a quarter over the next three years to keep vital sets running at current levels – adding nearly £500 to average yearly bills, town hall leaders warned last night.
The Local Government Association (LGA) said councils need an additional £8billion by 2024/25, largely due to an ageing population that method more will need social care.
The additional money is needed merely to keep social care sets at the same quality as at present, already though thousands of people are already being forced to do without the help they need.
It is also needed for child protection, homelessness prevention, waste and recycling, and road maintenance.
The LGA said that unless Rishi Sunak ploughs in additional funding from central government in this autumn’s spending review, council tax will have to rise by 25 per cent to pay for the sets.
Such an increase would see the average band D council tax bill in England soar from the present £1,898 to £2,372 – a rise of £474. But under current rules that would not be possible as town halls are unable to raise bills by more than 2 per cent, plus 3 per cent for social care, without a local referendum.
LGA said that unless Rishi Sunak (pictured) ploughs in additional funding from central government, council tax will have to soar by 25% over the next three years – adding nearly £500 to average yearly bills, town hall leaders warned last night
The Local Government Association (LGA) said councils need an additional £8billion by 2024/25, largely due to an ageing population that method more will need social care
LGA chairman James Jamieson said: ‘Councils continue to confront harsh funding and need pressures that will stretch the local sets our communities rely on to the limit. Securing the long-term sustainability of local sets must consequently be the top priority in the spending review.
‘If we are to come out of this pandemic with a society that is truly levelled up, the vital sets that councils provide must be at the heart of it.
‘Councils need certainty over their medium-term finances, adequate funding to tackle day-to-day pressures and long-term investment in people and transforming places across all parts of the country to turn levelling up from a political slogan to a reality that leads to real change for people’s lives.
‘Levelling up has to also average a drastic reset of the relationship between central and local – building back better method building back local.’
The LGA is calling on the Chancellor to use the spending review to create an current Community Investment Fund worth £1billion in 2022/23.
The LGA said that unless Rishi Sunak ploughs in additional funding from central government in this autumn’s spending review, council tax will have to rise by 25 per cent to pay for the sets
This non-ringfenced fund could be used by councils to invest in supporting individuals, strengthening communities and tackling priorities in their areas, including health inequalities – all of which will be vital to levelling up across the country.
The group’s examination estimates an average increase in annual cost pressures facing councils of £2.6billion per year to continue sets’ current level of access and quality, meaning the same sets will cost around £7.8billion more to provide in three years’ time.
An additional £8bn needed to keep social care sets at the same quality as present. This is largely due to an ageing population that method more will need social care (stock image)
Of this, £1.1billion per year is related to adult social care – in addition to a pre-existing £1.5billion provider market pressure – £0.6billion to children’s social care and £0.9billion to other council sets excluding education, police and fire sets.
In recent years, ministers have relied on council tax raising powers to increase councils’ chief spending strength.
The LGA said while the tax is an important funding stream, it has never been the solution to long-term pressures – it raises different amounts in different areas, unrelated to need, and adds to households’ financial pressures. It comes as 50 charities signed an open letter to Mr Sunak demanding he pumps billions more into social care in the spending review. They said Boris Johnson’s plans to fix social care will fail without an additional £4billion a year.
Last month the chief Minister unveiled his social care plan to ensure elderly people are not hit with sky-high bills. But it does not include additional money for social care until 2023, meaning people will confront cuts to care over the next two years unless more funding is ploughed in.
The charities, including Age UK, Care England and Marie Curie, asked for an increase in annual funding of £3.9billion by 2023/24.
Sunak’s £500m to help poorest pay winter bills
By John Stevens Deputy Political Editor
Rishi Sunak yesterday unveiled a £500million scheme to help the poorest families pay their bills this winter.
It comes as the Chancellor pushes ahead with the end of furlough and the cut to Universal Credit at a time when costs are spiralling. Up to 700,000 jobs are at risk after the furlough scheme closed yesterday.
A £20-a-week increase in Universal Credit introduced during the pandemic is due to finish next Wednesday. The new Household sustain Fund will see councils in England given money they can hand out in small grants to help meet daily needs such as food, clothing and utilities.
Lifeline: Rishi Sunak’s yesterday unveiled a £500million scheme to help the poorest families pay their bills this winter (stock image)
Mr Sunak called it a ‘lifeline’ and said: ‘Everyone should be able to provide the essentials and we are committed to ensuring that is the case.’ He stressed the fund would average ‘three or four million families getting an additional £100, £150.’
Anti-poverty charity the Joseph Rowntree Foundation blasted the ‘11th hour attempt to save confront’ before the Universal Credit cut. Deputy director Helen Barnard said: ‘By admitting today that families will need to apply for emergency grants to meet the cost of basics… it’s clear the Chancellor knows the damage the cut to Universal Credit will cause.’
New Economics Foundation modelling has found 710,000 furloughed jobs are at risk.
Click: See details